Difference between revisions of "Idiolect"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Translations== idioletto | idiolecte | Idiolekt ==Article== Since Bloch (1948), an idiolect is defined as the distinctive individual use of a linguistic code. Its equivalen...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Article== | ==Article== | ||
Since Bloch (1948), an idiolect is defined as the distinctive individual use of a linguistic code. Its equivalent in the domain of ancient text languages is the related, albeit complex, concept of [[grapholect]]. | Since Bloch (1948), an idiolect is defined as the distinctive individual use of a linguistic code. Its equivalent in the domain of ancient text languages is the related, albeit complex, concept of [[grapholect]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Example== | ||
| + | Examples for dead languages can only be provided for grapholectal codes and pertain to the domain of [[Document-level_phenomena| phenomena that only emerge in single documents or document groups]]. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Bloch, B. 1948. A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24, 3-46. | Bloch, B. 1948. A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24, 3-46. | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 28 December 2020
Contents
Translations
idioletto | idiolecte | Idiolekt
Article
Since Bloch (1948), an idiolect is defined as the distinctive individual use of a linguistic code. Its equivalent in the domain of ancient text languages is the related, albeit complex, concept of grapholect.
Example
Examples for dead languages can only be provided for grapholectal codes and pertain to the domain of phenomena that only emerge in single documents or document groups.
References
Bloch, B. 1948. A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language 24, 3-46.
