Phonological adaptation - Revision history

Admin at 10:32, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:32:36Z

Admin at 10:30, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:30:44Z

Admin at 10:29, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:29:37Z

Admin at 10:28, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:28:26Z

Admin at 10:27, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:27:34Z

Admin at 10:26, 30 June 2022

2022-06-30T10:26:56Z

Admin: Created page with "==Translations== adattamento fonologico | adaptation phonologique | phonologische Anpassung ==Article==
By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word..."

2022-06-30T10:19:43Z

Created page with "==Translations== adattamento fonologico | adaptation phonologique | phonologische Anpassung ==Article== <p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word..."

New page

==Translations==
adattamento fonologico | adaptation phonologique | phonologische Anpassung

==Article==
<p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word from a model language is adapted to the [[phoneme | phonemic inventory]] of a target language upon borrowing. Unlike diachronic sound laws within a single language, the changes that occur upon adaptation are not completely regular, even though tendencies may exist for a same phoneme of L1 to be generally rendered as a same phoneme of L2.</p>

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ==Example==
-<p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification | phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental patterning| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
+<p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification | phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental unit| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
 <p>That the outcome is not entirely regular can be easily shown with an example from onomastics. The Luwian name /*puna-zalma/ was rendered in Greek inscriptions from Lycia as both /ponoselmos/ and /poneselmos/, with two different rendering of a non-accented vowel (Giusfredi 2020).</p>
 ==References==
 Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172. Giusfredi, F. 2020. I luvi a Kanesh e i loro nomi, in Aula Orientalis 38, 245-254.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Example==
 <p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification | phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental patterning| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
-<p>That the outcome is not entirely regular can be easily shown with an example from onomastics. The Luwian name /*puna-zalma/ was rendered in Greek inscriptions from Lycia as both /ponoselmos/ and /poneselmos/, with two different rendering of a non-accented vowel.</p>
+<p>That the outcome is not entirely regular can be easily shown with an example from onomastics. The Luwian name /*puna-zalma/ was rendered in Greek inscriptions from Lycia as both /ponoselmos/ and /poneselmos/, with two different rendering of a non-accented vowel (Giusfredi 2020).</p>
 ==References==
-Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172
+Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172. Giusfredi, F. 2020. I luvi a Kanesh e i loro nomi, in Aula Orientalis 38, 245-254.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ==Example==
 <p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification | phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental patterning| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
-<p>That
+<p>That the outcome is not entirely regular can be easily shown with an example from onomastics. The Luwian name /*puna-zalma/ was rendered in Greek inscriptions from Lycia as both /ponoselmos/ and /poneselmos/, with two different rendering of a non-accented vowel.</p>
 ==References==
 Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Article==
-<p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word from a model language is adapted to the [[phoneme | phonemic inventory]] of a target language upon borrowing. Unlike diachronic sound laws within a single language, the changes that occur upon adaptation are not completely regular, even though tendencies may exist for a same phoneme of L1 to be generally rendered as a same phoneme of L2.</p>
+<p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word from a [[model language]] is adapted to the [[phoneme | phonemic inventory]] of a [[target language]] upon borrowing. Unlike diachronic sound laws within a single language, the changes that occur upon adaptation are not completely regular, even though tendencies may exist for a same phoneme of L1 to be generally rendered as a same phoneme of L2.</p>
 ==Example==
 <p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification | phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental patterning| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
 ==References==
 Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 30 June 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==References==		==References==
−	Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F.	+	Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F. 2012. Note sui prestiti accadici e urartei in luvio-geroglifico. P. Cotticelli, M. Giorgieri, C. Mora, A. Rizza (eds.), Interferenze linguistiche e contatti culturali in Anatolia tra II e I millennio a.C., studi in onore di Onofrio Carruba in occasione del suo 80. compleanno, Como, pp. 153-172

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 30 June 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Article==		==Article==
	<p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word from a model language is adapted to the [[phoneme \| phonemic inventory]] of a target language upon borrowing. Unlike diachronic sound laws within a single language, the changes that occur upon adaptation are not completely regular, even though tendencies may exist for a same phoneme of L1 to be generally rendered as a same phoneme of L2.</p>		<p>By phonological adaptation we indicate the process by which a word from a model language is adapted to the [[phoneme \| phonemic inventory]] of a target language upon borrowing. Unlike diachronic sound laws within a single language, the changes that occur upon adaptation are not completely regular, even though tendencies may exist for a same phoneme of L1 to be generally rendered as a same phoneme of L2.</p>
		+
		+	==Example==
		+	<p>The languages of the Ancient Near East, in spite of some cases of convergence, had different [[typological classification \| phonological typologies]], so processes of adaptation are common. One example is the change from emphatic /q/ of Akkadian to a different consonant of Sumerian, when Sumerian borrowed words from Akkadian (as for instance /sagia/ "cup bearer" from šāqû; Emelianov 2014). Similar is the case of the way the same emphatic consonant was rendered in Luwian when borrowing words from Neo-Assyrian, as in the case of the name of the goddess Damqina, rendered in this case as Tamukina (Giusfredi 2012). Here, the insertion of a posterior vowel may have also depended on the perception of the emphatic /q/ in the Assyrian model, which indicates that adaptation from one phoneme can be achieve also by [[supersegmental patterning\| supersegmental]] strategies.</p>
		+
		+	==References==
		+	Emelianov, V. Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian Revised. ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA 1, 483-514. Giusfredi, F.